Palaeontology: Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs

Studying fossils from a mass-mortality event reveals evidence for sexual dimorphism and, unusually, equal numbers of males and females in a herd of dinosaurs.
  1. Stella A Ludwig
  2. Roy E Smith
  3. Nizar Ibrahim  Is a corresponding author
  1. School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom

Sexual dimorphism – sex-specific differences in morphology and appearance – can be observed in many animals and is most obvious when it involves external and soft-tissue features, such as reproductive organs or brightly coloured feathers. In many cases, these features are accompanied by corresponding variations in the skeleton which can be subtle, but still sufficient to confidently tell the sexes apart. However, identifying differences in extinct animals remains a significant challenge, with a clear-cut example of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs proving particularly elusive.

The vast majority of dinosaur species have been identified from incomplete and fragmentary fossilised remains, and even near-complete skeletons rarely contain preserved soft tissues. In the past, researchers have used a wide range of skeletal features – including tail anatomy, overall robustness, and skull ornamentation – as evidence of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs (see for instance Chapman et al., 1997; Barden and Maidment, 2011; Padian and Horner, 2011; Mallon, 2017; Saitta et al., 2020). However, over millions of years, the bones have undergone significant and variable stresses, altering their shape in unique ways, and making it difficult to tell whether differences are due to modifications during fossilisation, sexual dimorphism, or individual variation within a species.

Although it might be assumed that a dinosaur skeleton found sitting on a clutch of eggs would be female, evidence from fossil egg clutches and modern birds suggests that male dinosaurs likely had a significant role in parental care in some species, resulting in such skeletons being assigned to both sexes in the past (see for example Norell et al., 1995; Grellet-Tinner et al., 2006; Martill et al., 1996; Varricchio et al., 2008, Yang et al., 2019). Additionally, the presence of medullary bone – a layer of material within bones which helps females to build an eggshell – has been used to sex dinosaurs. However, this material is only present when females are preparing to lay eggs, so it cannot reliably identify females at other times (Prondvai, 2017). Furthermore, skeletons are often found in different locations and the preserved animals may have lived several thousand or even millions of years apart, making it impossible to tell whether any variations in the skeleton are due to regional, temporal, individual, age-related or sex-related differences.

Therefore, demonstrating sexual dimorphism in a group of dinosaurs requires: i) a large sample size to allow for individual variation; ii) a method for identifying sexual dimorphism that is informed by the variation displayed by animals still in existence today. Now, in eLife, Romain Pintore, Raphaël Cornette, Alexandra Houssaye and Ronan Allain – who are based at the CNRS/Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle – report that the thigh bones of dinosaurs called ornithomimosaurs display several features that vary between the sexes (Pintore et al., 2023).

Pintore et al. studied a herd of at least 61 ornithomimosaurs deposited in a fossil bed in Angeac-Charente in the south-west of France. The herd died in a mass-mortality event in the Berriasian (Early Cretaceous) period – this presented the researchers with the opportunity to compare the fossilised remains of a large number of dinosaurs from the same place and time. Such opportunities are rare in palaeontology.

The researchers performed 3D geometric morphometric analysis – which can quantify subtle variations in biological shape – of the best-preserved hindlimb bones. The results showed that the thigh bones of the dinosaurs displayed subtle differences in shape that were independent of the size of the bone, with the most important variation being in the curvature of the femur (Figure 1). Given that similar differences in curvature have been observed between the sexes among the remaining archosaurs – such as birds and crocodiles – Pintore et al. attributed them to sexual dimorphism in ornithomimosaurs.

Having identified features which allowed them to differentiate between the sexes, Pintore et al. counted equal numbers of males and females in the Angeac-Charente ornithomimosaur herd. This differs from populations of some remaining archosaurs, whose initial equal sex ratio becomes skewed towards females in sub-adult and adult populations (Woodward and Murray, 1993; Magige, 2012; González et al., 2019; Prokopenko et al., 2021). Future work should investigate growth-related variations within the ornithomimosaur sample and determine the sex corresponding to each femur type. Such investigations could clarify whether sex ratios vary among ornithomimosaurs or whether they maintain an equal sex ratio across all age groups within the herd.

The findings are the first to examine sexual dimorphism in a group of dinosaurs that lived and died together, and they have significant implications for our understanding of dinosaur sex differences, behaviour and group dynamics. The work emphasises the importance of describing size-independent dimorphism in modern animals, where sex can be more easily determined, to aid interpretation of morphological differences in extinct species. Understanding how sex impacts the shape and size of extinct species also has broader implications for evolutionary mechanisms and, ultimately, our understanding of ancient ecosystems.

Sexual dimorphism in ornithomimosaurs.

(A–B) Pintore et al. identified subtle differences in the curvature and shape of the femur in fossils of ornithomimosaurs from the Angeac-Charente fossil site in France. Further work is needed to determine the sex corresponding to each type of femur. (C) Skeletal outline of an ornithomimosaur based upon Struthiomimus from Longrich, 2008; fig. 2, with the femur highlighted in red.


    1. Chapman RE
    2. Weishampel DB
    3. Hunt G
    4. Rasskin-Gutman D
    Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs
    Dinofest International 1:83–93.
    1. Magige FJ
    Spatial-temporal variation in sex ratio and group size of ostriches (Struthio camelus) in the Serengeti National Park and environs in Northern Tanzania
    Tanzania Journal of Science 38:15–23.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Stella A Ludwig

    Stella A Ludwig is in the School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom

    Contributed equally with
    Roy E Smith and Nizar Ibrahim
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0003-5703-5618
  2. Roy E Smith

    Roy E Smith is in the School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom

    Contributed equally with
    Stella A Ludwig and Nizar Ibrahim
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9119-8865
  3. Nizar Ibrahim

    Nizar Ibrahim is in the School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom

    Contributed equally with
    Stella A Ludwig and Roy E Smith
    For correspondence
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5839-6798

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 14, 2023 (version 1)


© 2023, Ludwig, Smith, Ibrahim

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.


  • 615
    Page views
  • 0

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Stella A Ludwig
  2. Roy E Smith
  3. Nizar Ibrahim
Palaeontology: Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs
eLife 12:e89158.

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    David A Murphy, Eyal Elyashiv ... Guy Sella
    Research Article Updated

    Analyses of genetic variation in many taxa have established that neutral genetic diversity is shaped by natural selection at linked sites. Whether the mode of selection is primarily the fixation of strongly beneficial alleles (selective sweeps) or purifying selection on deleterious mutations (background selection) remains unknown, however. We address this question in humans by fitting a model of the joint effects of selective sweeps and background selection to autosomal polymorphism data from the 1000 Genomes Project. After controlling for variation in mutation rates along the genome, a model of background selection alone explains ~60% of the variance in diversity levels at the megabase scale. Adding the effects of selective sweeps driven by adaptive substitutions to the model does not improve the fit, and when both modes of selection are considered jointly, selective sweeps are estimated to have had little or no effect on linked neutral diversity. The regions under purifying selection are best predicted by phylogenetic conservation, with ~80% of the deleterious mutations affecting neutral diversity occurring in non-exonic regions. Thus, background selection is the dominant mode of linked selection in humans, with marked effects on diversity levels throughout autosomes.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Yutian Li, Anish A Sarma ... Lea Goentoro

    Previously we reported evidence that a regenerative response in the appendages of moon jellyfish, fruit flies, and mice can be promoted by nutrient modulation (Abrams et al., 2021). Sustar and Tuthill subsequently reported that they had not been able to reproduce the induced regenerative response in flies (Sustar and Tuthill, 2023). Here we discuss that differences in the amputation method, treatment concentrations, age of the animals, and stress management explain why they did not observe a regenerative response in flies. Typically, 30–50% of treated flies showed response in our assay.