Brain Development: The dangers of rubella virus
The rubella virus can interfere with fetal brain development by infecting immune cells called microglia during pregnancy.
- Laboratory of Molecular Regulation of Neurogenesis, GIGA‐Stem Cells and GIGA-Neurosciences, Interdisciplinary Cluster for Applied Genoproteomics (GIGA‐R), University of Liège, Belgium
- WELBIO department, WEL Research Institute, Belgium
Some pathogens can be extremely harmfull during pregnancy as they can cross the placenta, infect the fetus, and go on to cause congenital birth defects, miscarriages and stillbirths (Pereira, 2018). The rubella virus, for example, can cause a range of congenital brain defects, and it is also associated with a higher risk of babies developing congenital rubella syndrome, a complex condition associated with developmental delays, cardiac anomalies, hearing impairment and eye abnormalities (Bardeletti et al., 1975; Lazar et al., 2016; Toizumi et al., 2017). These viruses and other pathogens are collectively referred to as TORCH pathogens, which is short for toxoplasmosis (which is caused by a parasite), other pathogens (such as syphilis, varicella, mumps, parvovirus B19 and HIV), rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus.
Despite the threat they pose to public health, the mechanisms by which TORCH pathogens affect brain development remain poorly understood. Now, in eLife, Tomasz Nowakowski, Joseph DeRisi and colleagues at the University of California San Francisco – including Galina Popova and Hanna Retallack as joint first authors – report new insights into the infection of brain cells by the rubella virus (Popova et al., 2023).
The researchers combined analyses of live human fetal brain slices that were maintained in the laboratory and two-dimensional cell cultures to study how the rubella virus affects brain cells. This revealed that the virus predominantly infects immune cells called microglia, which patrol and scavenge the central nervous system for damaged cells and pathogens. Microglia also have an important role in protecting the brain during development.
The experiments revealed that the rubella virus can only infect microglia when a variety of other brain cells are present. This is likely due to some yet-to-be-identified diffusible factors released by the other brain cells, which could render microglia susceptible to infection. However, the microglia do not need to make direct contact with these other cells in order to get infected.
Microglia play a crucial role in the antiviral immune response by releasing inflammatory cytokines, such as interferons (Sala and Kuka, 2020). Popova et al. found that infection with the rubella virus leads to an excessive interferon response by neighbouring neuronal cells, and this could have a deleterious effect on brain development. This is consistent with previous research, which showed that prenatal infection with rubella and HIV can trigger the overproduction of interferons, leading to prolonged inflammation that may contribute to the atypical development of the fetus (Crow et al., 2003). Certain inflammatory disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, are also characterized by an increased interferon response, and it is possible that some TORCH infections (in particular HIV and Rubella) share certain phenotypic similarities with these conditions.
As with many other TORCH pathogens, the fetus is most vulnerable to the rubella virus during the first trimester of pregnancy, due to the lack of immune defense in the developing fetus. Microglia populate the brain about a month into pregnancy, and the blood-brain barrier in the fetal brain only starts to be functional about two months into pregnancy (Menassa and Gomez-Nicola, 2018; Goasdoué et al., 2017). The brain is therefore extremely vulnerable to viruses during the first trimester of pregnancy, which coincides with a higher risk of developing severe developmental disorders.
The study of Popova et al. highlights the importance of using human cell-based models to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of congenital rubella syndrome. It remains to be seen why and how the rubella virus specifically attacks microglia, and what its molecular targets are. Identifying the molecular cues released by other brain cells, which potentially increase infection, will be necessary to eventually develop therapies against congenital rubella syndrome.
Figure 1
The effect of rubella virus on the brain development.
Rubella viruses (orange circles) target immune cells, called microglia (red), in the brain of the fetus. Popova et al. show that other neighbouring brain cells (pink, green and blue) must be present for infection to take place: it is thought that infection relies on diffusible factors released by these cells. Infection causes the release of large amounts of a signaling protein, called interferon (IFN; purple), which can damage the developing brain.
References
-
Morphology, biochemical analysis and neuraminidase activity of rubella virusArchives of Virology 49:175–186.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01317536
-
Microglial dynamics during human brain developmentFrontiers in Immunology 9:1014.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01014
-
Congenital viral infection: traversing the uterine-placental interfaceAnnual Review of Virology 5:273–299.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043236
Article and author information
Author details
Ekaterina Epifanova
Publication history
- Version of Record published: June 16, 2023 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2023, Epifanova and Nguyen
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 255
- Page views
-
- 0
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Brain Development: The dangers of rubella virus
eLife 12:e89265.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.89265
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
- Neuroscience
Neuronal information conductance often involves the transmission of action potentials. The spreading of action potentials along the axonal process of a neuron is based on three physical parameters: the axial resistance of the axon, the axonal insulation by glial membranes, and the positioning of voltage-gated ion channels. In vertebrates, myelin and channel clustering allow fast saltatory conductance. Here, we show that in Drosophila melanogaster voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels, Para and Shal, co-localize and cluster in an area resembling the axon initial segment. The local enrichment of Para but not of Shal localization depends on the presence of peripheral wrapping glial cells. In larvae, relatively low levels of Para channels are needed to allow proper signal transduction and nerves are simply wrapped by glial cells. In adults, the concentration of Para increases and is prominently found at the axon initial segment of motor neurons. Concomitantly, these axon domains are covered by a mesh of glial processes forming a lacunar structure that possibly serves as an ion reservoir. Directly flanking this domain glial processes forming the lacunar area appear to collapse and closely apposed stacks of glial cell processes can be detected, resembling a myelin-like insulation. Thus, Drosophila development may reflect the evolution of myelin which forms in response to increased levels of clustered voltage-gated ion channels.
-
- Neuroscience
A key factor in the clinical translation of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) for restoring hand motor function will be their robustness to changes in a task. With functional electrical stimulation (FES) for example, the patient’s own hand will be used to produce a wide range of forces in otherwise similar movements. To investigate the impact of task changes on BMI performance, we trained two rhesus macaques to control a virtual hand with their physical hand while we added springs to each finger group (index or middle-ring-small) or altered their wrist posture. Using simultaneously recorded intracortical neural activity, finger positions, and electromyography, we found that decoders trained in one context did not generalize well to other contexts, leading to significant increases in prediction error, especially for muscle activations. However, with respect to online BMI control of the virtual hand, changing either the decoder training task context or the hand’s physical context during online control had little effect on online performance. We explain this dichotomy by showing that the structure of neural population activity remained similar in new contexts, which could allow for fast adjustment online. Additionally, we found that neural activity shifted trajectories proportional to the required muscle activation in new contexts. This shift in neural activity possibly explains biases to off-context kinematic predictions and suggests a feature that could help predict different magnitude muscle activations while producing similar kinematics.
